poxy houses on blogspot home decor and furniture for future

Sunday, May 7, 2017

what happens when you baker act someone ???

certain criteria must be met to start a voluntary examination. Among the criteria are the following elements, by themselves, do not qualify an individual as having met or meet the criteria:

Reason to believe that the person has a mental illness; the refusal of voluntary screening; people who are unable to determine whether the examination is necessary. Criteria not met simply because a person has mental illness, appears to have mental problems, psychiatric medication, or have an emotional outburst. Criteria not met simply because those who refuse voluntary inspections. Criteria not met if there are family members or friends that will help avoid any potential threats and present major hazard.
 
Baker Act allows voluntary examination (what some call emergency or involuntary commitment). It can be initiated by judges, officers of the law enforcement, medical professionals, or mental health professionals. There must be evidence that the person:

may have a mental illness (as defined in the Baker Act).
is a danger to yourself, harm to others, or themselves default (as defined in the Baker Act).

The examination can last up to 72 hours after a person be deemed to be medically stable and occur in more than 100 Florida Department of children and families is set to receive facilities across the country.

There are many things that might be following examination of the patient. This includes the release of individuals to the Community (or other community placement), petition for the placement of patients not voluntary (what it says civil commitment), a voluntary outpatient placement (what is call outpatient commitment or assisted treatment orders), or voluntary treatment (if the person competent to consent to voluntary treatment and consent to voluntary treatment). Not voluntary outpatient placement language in the Baker Act in force as part of the reform Act Baker in 2005.

the Act was named for the Florida State representative from Miami, Maxine Baker, [2] which has a strong interest in issues of mental health, served as Chairman of the House Committee of Mental health, and is a sponsor of the Bill.

Nickname of the law has led to the term "Baker Act" as a verb, and "Baker Acted" as a verb passive-voice, to call upon the Act to force the individual commitment. Although Baker Act that's a resolution for only for the State of Florida, the use of "Baker Acting" as a verb has become common as the term slang for voluntary commitments in other areas of the United States of America
 
what happens when you baker act someone
http://pad2.whstatic.com/images/thumb/a/a4/Baker-Act-Someone-Step-1-Version-3.jpg/aid4784620-v4-728px-Baker-Act-Someone-Step-1-Version-3.jpg
 

Florida’s Baker Act is a Danger to All

If you find that someone is involuntarily committed to a psychiatric hospital, you may assume that the person must have some serious mental health problems and needs to be removed from society for assistance. This is not the usual case. In fact, each 1 1/4 minutes, someone is
voluntarily done so that it is not logical that there are many people out there that need to be
done or "Baker Act," as it is known in the State of Florida. Instead of this law protects individuals, it raises the threat of dangerous to anyone.

Baker Act stipulates that a person must have a mental illness and not seek treatment on their own. Further, without any treatment a person can cause bodily injury to himself and others based on behavior recently, so he needs to be forced into treatment. that is
The logic behind voluntary commitment. It sounds innocent enough, but in reality, it does not work.

The problem is who decides whether you are a danger to yourself or others?

Imagine having a fight with your neighbor who then call the police and say you are dangerous and you later retrieved and taken to the psychiatric facility. Imagine answering ads because you feel depressed over the death of a loved one and someone appears at your door telling you that you need to go to a psychiatric hospital to seek treatment at once. Imagine going to a psychiatrist to help with the stress of everyday life can only be done because he has deemed necessary. These are all examples of using Baker Act in the name of "public safety."

Logically you might think this is an example of misunderstanding that can be resolved easily. Not necessarily. A man over the age of seventy-four years is asked whether he was pressured by his home care nurse. Things are not looking particularly confident at the moment so she answered Yes. He
had to go to a psychiatric hospital and he tried to explain it was a misunderstanding, but he admitted as suicidal without so much as an opportunity to make a phone call to someone who will really help him. When one and a half to two million people voluntarily performed each year in the United States, we can only think there are many instances where a person is committed is not necessary.

Whether by mistake or not, under the Baker Act or law of voluntary commitment, you may be detained for a period of seventy-two hours for observation. A lot can happen in those seventy-two hours. Dr. Thomas Szasz, Professor of Psychiatry Emeritus, stating, "it's [voluntary commitments] involves
the lack of significantly larger than the rights from doing incarceration in prison. "

Once admitted, though it has legal rights, you may not have a chance to run them before treatment is started. You may have to take medication psikotropik with terrible side effects within seventy-two hours. Electro-shock might be deemed necessary to change
that unwanted behavior. Whatever it is, it is more than likely the law as accountability is not clearly defined.

Criminals need to be proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt but that's not the case when dealing with voluntary commitments. For example, if you suffer brain damage or if you have been made based on false information, the psychiatrist who is not responsible. The only evidence required is
the statutory procedures followed by the blessings of psychiatrists.

When the Baker Act in Florida, one has the right to consent is knowledgeable which means you need to be the reason you're admitted, what treatment will, purpose, benefits and side effects and what are the alternatives. You have the right to contact a lawyer and
You should be given a copy of these rights after admitted. That does not mean it will happen.

If someone is arrested by the police, that person informed of his Miranda rights. If one is Aker to act, he is not necessarily to its rights. members of the mental health ignore the law as
the formalities get on the road to get treatment for the patient. The problem is, if you don't know you have these rights and no one tells you about them, then an invitation to their neglected there and so is the opportunity for misuse.
 
One should also consider that the psychiatrist only treat symptoms and do not cure anything. There are no medical tests such as x-rays, blood tests, MRI or anything else to prove that "mental illness" or "mental disorder" exists in the body. It is ironic that psychiatrists have the force of law to force you to accept treatment that can paralyze you, however his actions not based on knowledge. However, this "expert" is one that can punish you dangerous to themselves or others in the name of "mental health care."

It is a wise step to obtain information and find out your rights so that you don't become one of those innocent Baker Act and mental paralysis.

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Google+
Tags :

Related : what happens when you baker act someone ???

0 comments:

Post a Comment